![]() ![]() It is hoped that this work can help in understanding the production of planning knowledge, help identify non-tokenist engagement of the public, and inform interactions between communities and policy makers. Edward Soja proposed the term socio-spatial dialectics, emphasizing the. Findings indicate that local knowledge has a distinctive spatiality and that there is a clear role for lay knowledge in the context of spatial strategy-making. Korean Studies, is defined on the basis of the territorial space of a nation. This draws on two years of embedded observation within a joint planning unit and a review of the North Northamptonshire Core Strategy of 2008, which culminated in substantial community engagement work early in 2011. Through an English case study it unpacks the dynamics between different types of knowledge around spatial planning where there is lay participation. This monograph starts to broach that gap, conceptualising a potential ‘socio-spatial learning’ where community engagement is framed as a collaborative learning arena within spatial planning. In particular there has not as yet been a thorough study of how understandings of space are produced in a spatial planning context that includes lay participants. The political and geographical motives in tandem with socio-cultural reasons. Using a sample of articles published in previous issues of the French Journal of British Studies, this article points to the socio-spatial dialectic of. Within that body of work, however knowledge is seen as an adjunct of power and there is little focus on the spatial particularity of knowledges. representations through the dialectical levels of space that are defined as. Similarly, participatory planning theories frame the debate in terms of communicative processes or competing rationalities. Theories of engagement draw on issues of ‘voice’ and the means to achieving deeper democracy. While issues of power and communication have been well examined this work rests on the argument that the associated production of knowledge needs to be better understood. This monograph looks at experiences of communities with spatial planning and applies those empirics to an underexplored area of participatory theory. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |